Immigration and Asylum Bill

Now at: Committee stage, House of Commons · text shown: Bill 105 · as introduced (30 June 2026) · checked 17 October 2026

Bill documents (21)

Bill (as introduced) ↗Explanatory Notes ↗Impact Assessment ↗Impact Assessment ↗Delegated Powers Memorandum ↗Delegated Powers Memorandum ↗Human Rights Memorandum ↗Human Rights Memorandum ↗Amendment Paper ↗Bill proceedings: Commons ↗Selection of amendments: Commons ↗Amendment Paper ↗Amendment Paper ↗Amendment Paper ↗Amendment Paper ↗Selection of amendments: Commons ↗Amendment Paper ↗Amendment Paper ↗Amendment Paper ↗Amendment Paper ↗Amendment Paper ↗all documents on Parliament ↗

Showing Clause 36 only. View the whole Bill ← clause 35clause 37 →

212 amendments tabled at Committee stage, House of Commons, 62 by the Government, the ones most likely to become law. 69 are new in the last 7 days. So far 22 agreed, 15 rejected and 23 withdrawn or not pressed; the Committee next sits on Tuesday 20 October.

Key: how to read this page

The Bill is shown clause by clause (then Schedule by Schedule). Where a clause or Schedule paragraph amends an existing Act, the affected provision is shown underneath in a shaded box, as it would read once the change is applied: insertions underlined, deletions struck through, pulled from legislation.gov.uk. A clause with no shaded box makes new law of its own rather than amending an existing Act. Text shown lightened and in italics is not yet in force.

An unofficial reading aid: always verify against the Bill and the legislation. Nothing here is legal advice.

Part 5 — Modern Slavery

36

36 — Deciding if a person is a victim: credibility

amends 1 amendment
(1)Part 5 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 (modern slavery) is amended as follows.
(2)After section 60 insert—
60ADeciding if a person is a victim: credibility
(1)Subsection (2) applies where a competent authority is making a reasonable grounds decision or a conclusive grounds decision in relation to a person.
(2)In determining whether to believe a statement made by or on behalf of the person, the competent authority must take account, as damaging the person’s credibility, of—
(a)any delay by the person in making a claim to be a victim of slavery or human trafficking,
(b)any delay by the person in providing the competent authority with any relevant status information,
(c)any material inaccuracy, inconsistency or omission in relevant status information provided by the person to the competent authority,
(d)any material inconsistency between relevant status information provided by the person to the competent authority and any information provided by the person in connection with—
(i)any protection claim or human rights claim made by the person, or
(ii)any civil or criminal proceedings to which the person is a party, and
(e)any striking similarity between the relevant status information provided by the person to the competent authority and any information provided by another person in connection with—
(i)a claim to be a victim of slavery or human trafficking made by that other person,
(ii)a protection claim or human rights claim made by that other person,
(iii)any civil or criminal proceedings to which that other person is a party.
(3)But subsection (2) does not apply if the competent authority is satisfied that there are good reasons for the delay, inaccuracy, inconsistency, omission or similarity.
(4)In deciding whether there are good reasons, the competent authority must have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
(5)The provision of relevant status information in response to a claim notice, after the claim notice deadline, is to be treated as a delay for the purposes of subsection (2)(a) or (b).
(6)For the purposes of subsection (2)(a) a person makes a claim to be a victim of slavery or human trafficking if they make a disclosure of information that tends to suggest they may be a victim.
(7)In this section— “claim notice” means a notice under section 11 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 2026; “claim notice deadline” has the meaning given in section 11(3) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 2026; “human rights claim” and “protection claim” have the same meanings as in Part 2; “relevant status information”, in relation to a person, means information that may be relevant for the purpose of making a reasonable grounds decision or a conclusive grounds decision in relation to the person.
(3)Omit sections 58 and 59 (slavery or trafficking information notices).
Inserts a new provision into Nationality and Borders Act 2022 — after section 60
Amends Nationality and Borders Act 2022, section 58 — Provision of information relating to being a victim of slavery or human trafficking
As it would read once this is applied · text as at 17 October 2026 · view full text on legislation.gov.uk ↗
Nationality and Borders Act 2022 — section 58

Section 58 of Nationality and Borders Act 2022 is not yet in force — it has never been brought into force; this Bill repeals it before it ever comes into force (shown struck through, lightened).

(1) The Secretary of State may serve a slavery or trafficking information notice on a person who has made a protection claim or a human rights claim.
(2) A “slavery or trafficking information notice” is a notice requiring the recipient to provide the Secretary of State (and any other competent authority specified in the notice), before the specified date, with any relevant status information the recipient has.
(3) “Relevant status information” is information that may be relevant for the purpose of making a reasonable grounds decision or a conclusive grounds decision in relation to the recipient.
(4) Subsection (5) applies if the recipient of a slavery or trafficking information notice provides the Secretary of State or competent authority with relevant status information on or after the specified date.
(5) The recipient must also provide a statement setting out their reasons for not providing the relevant status information before the specified date (and see section 59).
(6) In this section—
“protection claim” and “human rights claim” have the same meanings as in Part 2;
“specified date” means the date specified in the slavery or trafficking information notice.
About the provision this changes
Free Movement articles: Nationality and Borders Act 2022 ↗
Amends Nationality and Borders Act 2022, section 59 — Late compliance with slavery or trafficking information notice: damage to credibility
As it would read once this is applied · text as at 17 October 2026 · view full text on legislation.gov.uk ↗
Nationality and Borders Act 2022 — section 59

Section 59 of Nationality and Borders Act 2022 is not yet in force — it has never been brought into force; this Bill repeals it before it ever comes into force (shown struck through, lightened).

(1) This section applies where—
(a) a person aged 18 or over has been served with a slavery or trafficking information notice under section 58,
(b) the person provided relevant status information late, and
(c) a competent authority is making a reasonable grounds decision or a conclusive grounds decision in relation to the person.
(2) In determining whether to believe a statement made by or on behalf of the person, the competent authority must take account, as damaging the person’s credibility, of the late provision of the relevant status information, unless there are good reasons why the information was provided late.
(3) For the purposes of this section, relevant status information is provided “late” by the person if it is provided on or after the date specified in the slavery or trafficking information notice.
(4) In this section, “relevant status information” has the same meaning as in section 58 (see subsection (3) of that section).
Explanatory Notes · published by the Government with the Bill
278. The clause amends Part 5 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 to insert a new section 60A. This sets out the factors which a competent authority (decision-maker) must take into account when determining whether an individual is a potential victim or a victim of modern slavery (i.e. when making a reasonable grounds of conclusive grounds decision (as defined in section 69 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022)). 279. Subsection (1) of section 60A sets out that the provisions in subsection (2) will apply whenever a competent authority is making a reasonable grounds or conclusive grounds decision. 280. Subsection (2) of section 60A sets out a list of factors that, in assessing whether to believe an account put forward by or on behalf of a person, a competent authority must take into account as damaging a person’s credibility, as follows: a) any delay in the person making a claim that they are a victim of modern slavery (subsection (2)(a)); b) any delay in the person providing ‘relevant status information’ (i.e. information relevant to a reasonable grounds or conclusive grounds decision) to the competent authority (subsection (2)(b)); c) any material inaccuracy, inconsistency or omission in the information provided by the person, to the competent authority (subsection (2)(c)); d) any material inconsistency between the information provided by the person by the individual to the competent authority and any information they have provided in connection with a protection or human rights claim they have made, or any civil or criminal proceedings where they are a party (subsection (2)(d)); and e) any striking similarity between the information provided by the person to the competent authority and information that has been provided by another person in connection with a claim they have made to be a victim of modern slavery or trafficking, a protection or human rights claim they have made; or any civil or criminal proceedings in which they are a party (subsection (2)(e)). The term ‘striking similarity’ is intended to capture both very similar and identical accounts. 281. Subsection (3) of section 60A sets out that subsection (2) will not apply in a given case (i.e. there will be no adverse impact on credibility) where the competent authority is satisfied that there are good reasons for the factor(s) listed in (a). to (e). above arising. 282. Subsection (4) of section 60A requires the competent authority to have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State in deciding whether there are good reasons for the purposes of subsection (3) above. 283. Subsection (5) of section 60A makes clear the link between clause 36 and claims notices under clause 11, setting out that where a person has been served a claim notice under clause 11 and provides relevant status information after the deadline set out in the notice, this is to be treated as a delay for the purposes of subsection (2)(a) or (b), and therefore will have an adverse impact on the person’s credibility, unless there are good reasons provided for the lateness. 284. For the purposes of subsection (2)(a) above (i.e. relating to delay in making a claim), subsection (6) defines ‘making a claim to be a victim of slavery or human trafficking’ if they make a disclosure of information that tends to suggest they may be a victim. 285. Subsection (7) of section 60A defines several terms for the purposes of section 60A. It defines “claim notice” as a notice issued under clause 11; “claim notice deadline” as having the meaning given in clause 11(3); “human rights claim” and “protection claim” as having the same meanings as set out in Part 2 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022; and “relevant status information” in relation to a person as information provided by a person that may be relevant for the purpose of making a reasonable grounds decision or a conclusive grounds decision in relation to them. 286. Subsection (3) of clause 36 repeals sections 58 and 59 (slavery or trafficking information notices) from Part 5 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022. These are uncommenced provisions and will be replaced by the provisions in clause 11 of this Bill.
Amendments tabled 1 · 1 would remove the whole clause

Changes MPs have proposed to this clause at Committee stage, House of Commons, in the order they fall in the text. None has been debated yet. An amendment changes the Bill only if it is agreed. All amendments to the Bill

Green Party: Siân Berry, Green Spokesperson (Home) Would remove the whole clause Not yet debated
The amendment · as tabled, addressed to the printed Bill
Page 37, line 24, leave out Clause 36

No explanatory statement was published with this amendment.

Give feedback

What's this about? *